Forced Gun Sales
I concur with the latest iteration of the TN hippie contingent:
Making the sale of confiscated weapons mandatory seems like a serious overstep on the part of the state. Each county and municipality should have the authority to determine what is right for its community, rather than be dictated to by the state legislature on this issue.
Sure. Let the cities decide what they want to do. But, as is expected from the local hippie contingent, the truthiness is weak:
The revelation that two guns used in recent high profile shootings only makes that more clear, even though the sale of those weapons came years before the enactment of this law.
Except that whole part about that law not being in effect when those shooters obtained their guns. So, Memphis did decide to sell the guns prior to that law going into effect. But the progressive community tends to get facts about guns wrong, so that’s not surprising. They even parrot the year of the gun canard:
here’s to hoping that at some point these folks will stop focusing so much on firearms access, and spend a little more time on something that effects all of us, like say employment access.
Last year was called “year of the gun” because the legislature spent a whopping 1.8% of their time addressing gun bills that Jimmy Naifeh had spent years killing in committee.
Clenched fist salute to ACK.
March 16th, 2010 at 4:43 pm
Sure; let the cities decide, if and only if they’re not getting money from the state. If the state is funding their lame asses at all, the state can properly make some rules preventing the wasting of valuable resources like those guns.
March 17th, 2010 at 10:15 am
I agree with Lyle.
The state has full power and authority to make laws which are applicable from Mountain City to Memphis.
March 17th, 2010 at 2:56 pm
No city or local government has lawful power to violate any rights enumerated in the Tennessee Constitution’s Declaration of Rights. And according to Article I, Section 26, the citizens of this state have a right to bear (carry) arms for self-defense. If localities can violate that one, are we going to allow them arbitrary, tyrannical power to violate the others?