Was just reading about security on phones… Good luck getting that data off of an IPhone if you set a pin longer than 6 digits… The whole thing is AES-256 encrypted if you set a pin…
Your right, the 4th amendment DOES NOT apply. You should know that your cell phone is trackable. Therefor you should have no expectation of privacy and that is one of the tests for warrantless law enforcement activity. If you don’t want to be tracked, get a “burner” phone.
A cell phone is nothing but a radio that sends out signals. The feds can track the signals. If you’re carrying a device that broadcasts your location, how can you claim that someone tracking it is unconstitutional.
Know your rights and don’t do stupid stuff. If you don’t want to be tracked, drop the cell phone in the nearest creek.
August 15th, 2012 at 9:49 pm
Sounds like SCOTUS has some more work coming their way.
August 16th, 2012 at 12:52 am
Was just reading about security on phones… Good luck getting that data off of an IPhone if you set a pin longer than 6 digits… The whole thing is AES-256 encrypted if you set a pin…
August 16th, 2012 at 8:27 am
Your right, the 4th amendment DOES NOT apply. You should know that your cell phone is trackable. Therefor you should have no expectation of privacy and that is one of the tests for warrantless law enforcement activity. If you don’t want to be tracked, get a “burner” phone.
August 16th, 2012 at 10:15 am
in the story the guy had a “burner phone”, which makes me curious how the feds got access to it so quickly.
August 16th, 2012 at 6:55 pm
A cell phone is nothing but a radio that sends out signals. The feds can track the signals. If you’re carrying a device that broadcasts your location, how can you claim that someone tracking it is unconstitutional.
Know your rights and don’t do stupid stuff. If you don’t want to be tracked, drop the cell phone in the nearest creek.