In potential assault weapons ban news
A good review of some of the goings on in the senate: ‘Assault Weapon’ Banners Still Can’t Say What an ‘Assault Weapon’ Is. Hand guard, barrel shroud? What’s the diff?
Also, Feinstein says weapons she doesn’t approve are unnecessary ‘personal pleasures’. My rights to free speech and religion are also unnecessary ‘personal pleasures’.
March 1st, 2013 at 1:42 am
When will the kids realize that the left has gone full Puritain on us?
March 1st, 2013 at 8:18 am
She put her finger into the hole in Harvey Milk’s head, she told reporters. Someone needs to have a long talk with her, in a very public forum, on this ‘personal pleasures’ thing.
March 1st, 2013 at 11:01 am
Personal pleasures? Like marriages that could NEVER produce children?
March 1st, 2013 at 11:23 am
“My rights to free speech and religion are also unnecessary ‘personal pleasures’.”
Don’t worry, they’re coming after those, too. ObamaCare, for sure, will take care of that pesky freedom-of-religion thing.
I sure do hope they interview McCarthy again. Having learned her lesson about barrel shrouds, maybe this type she’ll say they are “…those shoulder things that go DOWN.”
March 1st, 2013 at 1:01 pm
IF they ever pass another Federal AWB, those of us who lived through the last one know that Owning a Banned Weapon or Magazine wasn’t Illegal under Federal Law. Just Damn Expensive.
What we have to watch out for is Phase Two, where they try to make us turn them in after they are Banned.
Stay Alert!