Either that, or they’d list you for “special treatment/surveillance” as an obviously dangerous subversive, and then later send a SWAT team or two around to “have a chat” with you.
It’d take ’em awhile, though – since none of them would recognize it for some time; it wasn’t apparently “required reading” in any of their Big Gummint Agent indoctrination classes.
Also agree with JS
Now, who was it that Janet Reno cited as persons of interest in “domestic” terrorism?
Who’s on the IRS “keyword” list for “special” attention?
They refuse to read it.
Judge Skretny’s recent decision on the SAFE Act was consistent with a Second Amendment that reads, “…the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall be infringed.” He changed the magazine limit from 7 to 10, but 10 is still an infringement.
As David Coder says, every day is opposite day with “Progressives”. “Shall not be infringed” now means “shall be infringed” according to a federal judge’s ruling.
January 17th, 2014 at 7:50 pm
Nah. They would just refine their search to exclude it.
January 17th, 2014 at 8:36 pm
Either that, or they’d list you for “special treatment/surveillance” as an obviously dangerous subversive, and then later send a SWAT team or two around to “have a chat” with you.
It’d take ’em awhile, though – since none of them would recognize it for some time; it wasn’t apparently “required reading” in any of their Big Gummint Agent indoctrination classes.
January 17th, 2014 at 8:47 pm
I would tend to agree with JS…
January 17th, 2014 at 10:01 pm
Great twist!
January 17th, 2014 at 10:12 pm
Like.
January 17th, 2014 at 11:11 pm
no.
no they would not.
They would not start reading the Constitution even if you put it in your emails.
And if they did they wouldn’t understand it.
I have links.
January 17th, 2014 at 11:20 pm
Did you capitalize the “C” and lowercase the rest? If not, no problem. Carry on.
January 18th, 2014 at 12:20 am
Try it on a hockey mask. They’re into hockey.
January 18th, 2014 at 10:56 am
The other problem is the ones who do read it use all of the words wrong.
January 18th, 2014 at 11:47 am
Also agree with JS
Now, who was it that Janet Reno cited as persons of interest in “domestic” terrorism?
Who’s on the IRS “keyword” list for “special” attention?
January 18th, 2014 at 2:26 pm
They refuse to read it.
Judge Skretny’s recent decision on the SAFE Act was consistent with a Second Amendment that reads, “…the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall be infringed.” He changed the magazine limit from 7 to 10, but 10 is still an infringement.
As David Coder says, every day is opposite day with “Progressives”. “Shall not be infringed” now means “shall be infringed” according to a federal judge’s ruling.