Only the police should have guns
6 Responses to “Only the police should have guns”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
April 21st, 2016 at 10:24 pm
I remember my first desk pop.
April 21st, 2016 at 10:27 pm
They kept referring to the gun as a “baby glock”, so I thought this was the new small one, but then they claimed it was a .22 caliber… Is that the 40 S&W, or could this just be some other gun and the media can’t be bothered to do a 2 second google search?
April 22nd, 2016 at 8:38 am
“…could this just be some other gun and the media can’t be bothered to do a 2 second google search?”
Yes.
Just like every semi-auto carbine is either an AK47 or an M16, you know every handgun is a “Glock,” so therefore any smaller handgun would be a “baby Glock.” Caliber is to be referred to by both standard and metric (i.e. .22mm), or if unknown, make one up.
Facts–Who needs ’em when you can control the narrative?
April 22nd, 2016 at 5:57 pm
Meanwhile, at the Hall of Justice…
What the f…??!?!
The language used in the article stands out from your usual “negligent discharge by law enforcement” article.
Phrases were used such as, “…pulled the trigger…” and “…accidentally fired it…” instead of “the gun discharged” or “the gun fired”.
April 22nd, 2016 at 10:30 pm
“The second deputy pointed the weapon at the first deputy and – apparently unaware the weapon was loaded – pulled the trigger.”
TWO major fails in one paragraph.
April 23rd, 2016 at 10:38 pm
Chicks with dicks, man. Chicks with dicks.