That’s East Tennessee For Ya (Pt 2)
This morning on the radio, a caller tries to convince listeners and the host that Bill Clinton is the precursor to the anti-Christ.
Sure, I took issue with some of Clinton’s policies and contend he was (at best) an average president. But the anti-Christ?
September 15th, 2003 at 10:33 am
No imagination. “Clinton is the Anti-christ.” “Bush is Hitler.”
I mean, just once couldn’t someone accuse Clinton of being Pontius Pilot, or Bush of being Mussolini? Mix it up, guys.
September 15th, 2003 at 12:16 pm
Exactly what is a precursor to the anti-Christ? Is that supposed to mean that Clinton is in cahoots with, or laying groundwork for, someone who is the anti-Christ?
September 15th, 2003 at 12:27 pm
Thankfully, the host cut him off before he got much further so i don’t know where he was going. His premise was that the AC would be a likeable and believable chap. Clinton was the former, but not that latter.
September 15th, 2003 at 1:02 pm
“His premise was that the AC would be a likeable and believable chap.”
Sounds like the interviews TV reporters have with a serial killer’s neighbors and co-workers after he’s caught.
“Dave just seemed like a normal guy. Our kids used to play Little League together. I borrowed his ladder one time. And then to find out he’s the Anti-Christ? Well, you coulda just knocked me over with a feather.”
September 15th, 2003 at 8:10 pm
Bill Clinton is not the anti-Christ. A thorough reading of revelation will show that the title actually belongs to Ralph Reed, a point I’ve been making repeatedly since he was a big kahuna in the Christian Coalition. ๐
(Tradition has it that the anti-Christ will be a smooth-talking, attractive person; a false prophet who wraps themselves up in superficially righteous causes for personal gain; and only after achieving a powerful position on the world stage will the truly evil nature be revealed.)
You heard it here first. Ralph Reed. ๐