Another Iraq & Al Qaeda link
Apparently, Clinton’s DOJ thought there was a link too.
4 Responses to “Another Iraq & Al Qaeda link”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
November 17th, 2003 at 12:00 pm
Aha! If Clinton’s DOJ thought there was a link, we can be certain that there wasn’t one, because the Clinton DOJ couldn’t do anything right!
*ducks*
November 17th, 2003 at 12:10 pm
Hehe. At this point tom, even you may have to consider that where there’s smoke, there’s fire 🙂
November 17th, 2003 at 12:13 pm
Must I? Remember, also, that an indictment is nothing more than a formal charge. If an indictment constitutes evidence, then all of the DOJ’s actions at Waco were totally justified.
November 17th, 2003 at 3:49 pm
SU
Not really. I was prepared to be surprised when I read this, but a prosecuter could indict a pencil for manslaughter if he/she wanted to. Consideringt hat this happened at around the same time as the intesification of the bombings and heightened criticism of the sanctions policy, it looks more like PR than evidence.