We Cancel, Blah
My entry regarding Salon’s bashing of anonymous bloggers stated that it was lame that the Salon article wasn’t signed. It was hypocritical.
Two readers have confirmed that they don’t see a name either (see here and here). I guess my original contention stands: lame.
Additionally, the always excellent Publicola offers some insights in the comments section as to why anonymous guys may even be more credible.
February 5th, 2004 at 3:37 pm
As I recall, the original Salon column was signed, but then they had to change it because it had a big problem. I’m guessing someone else did the re-write so they just left it without an author. Ironic, given the subject matter.
As far as anonymous blogging goes, I don’t have a problem with it. Then again, I come here for links and opinion, not hardcore “news.”