Eh. Would need to see more pictures, but from the first one: nice rack, ordinary face. Certainly not worthy of a “damn.” Nice teeth, though. I bet she could chew corn through a fence with those! 🙂 *ducks*
Actually, as I think about it, I shouldn’t be too hard on her. At least she’s got curves, which is more than I can say for most models these days. I don’t know who decided that the ideal woman ought to be a toothpick with no boobs, but that person should be shot.
February 10th, 2004 at 1:12 pm
Hey, warn us next time! That link is barely SFW…. 😉
I let my SI subsription run out, but I may have to go get that issue at the newsstand. Just don’t tell anyone…
February 10th, 2004 at 1:14 pm
That link is entirely work safe. Bathing suits are clothes too.
February 10th, 2004 at 2:47 pm
Eh. Would need to see more pictures, but from the first one: nice rack, ordinary face. Certainly not worthy of a “damn.” Nice teeth, though. I bet she could chew corn through a fence with those! 🙂 *ducks*
February 10th, 2004 at 2:53 pm
You mean her face was in the picture? I didn’t notice.
February 10th, 2004 at 3:37 pm
Not where I work 😉
February 10th, 2004 at 4:59 pm
Those teeth would make Carly Simon and John Elway proud!
February 13th, 2004 at 12:46 am
Actually, as I think about it, I shouldn’t be too hard on her. At least she’s got curves, which is more than I can say for most models these days. I don’t know who decided that the ideal woman ought to be a toothpick with no boobs, but that person should be shot.
February 13th, 2004 at 12:49 am
Looking at the choices, she was the best, I’d have to agree.