Some good
I often point out bad articles that misrepresent the assault weapons ban. Periodically, I run across one that is factual. Here’s a good one.
I often point out bad articles that misrepresent the assault weapons ban. Periodically, I run across one that is factual. Here’s a good one.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
October 7th, 2004 at 8:57 am
I’m still looking for an explanation of why democrats and newspapers keep referring to “clips.” Whats up with that?
Does this mean my a 6 round magazine for my 1911 isn’t a magazine? Are my 10 round G23 magazines clips and only my 13 round standard size mags are really magazines?
How many people, who are familiar with guns, do you know who refer to magazines as clips?
Did this come from some Hollyweird movie or something? Is there a Brady study showing people are more fearful of clips than magazines??
What gives. Amongst all the chatter and innacuracies I hear in the media, I think this might be the thing that bugs me the most.
October 7th, 2004 at 9:46 am
Hmmm…are flash suppressors REALLY intended to keep people from finding you in the dark?
October 8th, 2004 at 10:04 am
Score! on the clip vs magazine thing. One of my favorite peeves. Sadly, yes, I do know lots of people familiar with guns that call magazines clips. We’re simply losing the war with that one. No one cares but us cranks.
And flash suppressors serve a dual-role. One, yes – to make it harder to find you in the dark, but more importantly, to reduce the flash and the effect is has on *your* ability to *see* in the dark…
October 8th, 2004 at 10:20 am
Morning Reads
Erik at ˇNo Pasaran! observes this about the Iraq Study Group report: If the Iraq Survey Group’s report is embarrassing for the British and US governments, for those of Russia, France, and China, it is damning… Remember – these are…
October 9th, 2004 at 3:18 pm
Its only worse when someone says “Hey, look at my new 30 round banana clip!” Sigh…
Good find on the article.