Parker V. DC
Volokh notes the other Second Amendment challenge to the DC gun ban and compares it to Seegars. Bob Levy writes:
We assert that Parker is factually distinguishable from Seegars. (1) Parker plaintiffs were personally and unambiguously threatened w/prosecution by DC officials during oral argument and in the press. (2) DC’s failure to raise standing in Parker reaffirms the city’s intent to prosecute. (3) Trial judge Sullivan, after ordering supplemental briefing on standing, did not mention that issue in his opinion on the merits.
I think, as is usually the case, the court will chicken out of the issue. If forced to rule on it, they won’t be very second amendment friendly.
Update: Trigger finger has much, much more.
