Gun control is a political loser
So says the US News and World Report:
The NRA is riding high; gun control is a political loser
[snip]
“When we as Democrats are trying to reach out and speak to voters in the center of the country, I don’t think that we can support gun control,” he explains. After seeing Democrats hammered at the polls for voting to regulate guns, many of his colleagues seem to agree. As a result, a number of pro-gun measures moving through Congress will most likely face little opposition, as advocates of gun control increasingly find themselves marginalized and ignored.
Not long ago, it was the gun lobby on the defensive from the passage of the Brady bill in 1993 and the 1994 ban on “assault” weapons. But some say support for gun control cost Democrats the House in 1994, and former President Clinton credited it with Al Gore’s 2000 presidential defeat. “It’s different than it was in the early ’90s. Those were, in retrospect, the glory years,” says Paul Helmke, former GOP mayor of Fort Wayne, Ind., who recently took the reins of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.
Meanwhile, with little fanfare, National Rifle Association backers in Congress allowed the assault weapons ban to expire in 2004 and last year shielded gun makers from being sued over crimes committed using their products. Since 1999, nine states have eased restrictions on concealed weapons, and NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre says the freedom of gun owners is in “the best shape it’s been in decades.”
Ayup.
July 10th, 2006 at 10:44 am
I like the admission by the Johns Hopkins gun/violence guru (in the linked article) that the AWB was not really effective at curbing crime.
Imagine that.
He goes on to admit that the AWB was effective at agitating (more like galvanizing) gun owners.
July 10th, 2006 at 11:48 am
I think the biggest indication of progress is that a main stream media outlet decided to put scare quotes around the “assault” in “assault weapon ban”.
July 10th, 2006 at 5:45 pm
SD: +1