“Maybe not require. That would be heavy-handed government intrusion in our personal lives, which we oppose. But allow us a choice to own a surface-to-air missile to protect our family and home from evildoers? Count us in. At least give us the option. Talk about enlightened and progressive public policy.”
“Enlightened” to the demlibs is “do it OUR way, we know what’s best”.
“Progressive” is taking away our rights for our own good.
November 18th, 2007 at 4:00 pm
“Maybe not require. That would be heavy-handed government intrusion in our personal lives, which we oppose. But allow us a choice to own a surface-to-air missile to protect our family and home from evildoers? Count us in. At least give us the option. Talk about enlightened and progressive public policy.”
“Enlightened” to the demlibs is “do it OUR way, we know what’s best”.
“Progressive” is taking away our rights for our own good.
November 18th, 2007 at 6:51 pm
Who needs SAMs when you can have NNS?
November 18th, 2007 at 10:58 pm
Over the top. Just because I want an AR now I lusting after SAMS?
What happened to my nukes?
November 19th, 2007 at 1:27 am
“Who needs SAMs when you can have NNS?”
WTF? They didnt have a 1-800 number! I want one!