What media bias against guns?
3 Responses to “What media bias against guns?”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
February 28th, 2008 at 3:25 pm
“ATF agents seized box after box of shoulder-fired rifles and hundreds of stocks, barrels and scopes in connection with an investigation into federal firearms violations at the facility.”
This just in: “ATF finds guns at gun manufacturer’s warehouse, film at 11.”
Oh and get the “shoulder-fired rifles” PSH. Since a rifle is a shoulder firearm discharging bullets through a rifled barrel at lest 16 inches in length (27CFR447.11), a shoulder-fired shoulder firearm must be something really bad and evil. Sad thing is the report shows such ignorance of firearms that they had to get the “shoulder-fired rifles” description from the ATF or local police.
Look at this PSH news report The took “AK-47s, assault weapons and high powered rifles”. Kind of runs right over the fraud and money laundering reason for the raid.
February 28th, 2008 at 5:40 pm
Are those “shoulder-fired” assault weapons any less violent then the “spray-fire from the hip” assault weapons we’ve heard so much about?
I wish they’d make up their mind.
I’m getting confused.
February 28th, 2008 at 10:23 pm
Well, you could technically call them “shoulder fired missiles” as the word “missile” also refers to anything hurled through the air.