CNN kicks out the anti-gun bias with the help of ATF
ATF Agent Tom Mangan is at it again. You may be asking yourself: Where do I know that guy? Here’s a hint.
6 Responses to “CNN kicks out the anti-gun bias with the help of ATF”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
March 26th, 2008 at 12:50 pm
wouldn’t it be funny if someone filed a Data Quality Act petition with the ATF forcing them to withdraw the public statements of Tom Mangam???
Hmm . . . .
March 26th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
Here’s a link to DOJ’s Data Quality guidelines
March 26th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
Before I hit that link, I thought I was the only one in all the blogs who knew anything about Title 18.
On the other hand, I discovered — twenty-one years ago — how nearly impossible it is to get a case like that into federal court.
March 26th, 2008 at 9:32 pm
The Law does not apply to agents of the federal government any more.
March 26th, 2008 at 10:11 pm
I found this particularly interesting:
Wait, you mean this dangerous high-capacity assault rifle isn’t actually all that powerful? *gasp*
Actually the problem with this quote is that the officer is undergunned when facing multiple opponents with *any* type of gun, which is the likely scenario. But it is wonderfully ironic that he’s cited as “no match” for US civilian-legal weapons when he’s got a full-auto military M-16, banned to us peons north of the border!
March 27th, 2008 at 12:58 am
Bill Beck, are you referring to the Data Quality Act? Its actually an amendment (well, I guess thats what you’d call it – it was really an appropriations rider) to the Paperwork Reduction Act which is Title 44. Title 18 is the criminal code.
Tom Stone – what are you talking about?