It isn’t “close”… its really a blowout, considering how MSNBC is weaseling the terms. 3 of the 4 items demonstrate a desire to abolish the current ban in national parks… #1 “apply state law” is kinda what we’re shooting for… although a lot of people are voting for absolute unrestricted open or concealed carry. Regardless, 64% of people wanting to abolish the current rule isn’t a “close” margin. The only thing that’s close is the divide between people who are against guns in NPs, and those who are for unrestricted carry rights.
And you know that when they report the results it will be something along the lines of “More people oppose guns in parks than believe there should be no restrictions” or something along those lines.
July 25th, 2008 at 8:26 am
It isn’t “close”… its really a blowout, considering how MSNBC is weaseling the terms. 3 of the 4 items demonstrate a desire to abolish the current ban in national parks… #1 “apply state law” is kinda what we’re shooting for… although a lot of people are voting for absolute unrestricted open or concealed carry. Regardless, 64% of people wanting to abolish the current rule isn’t a “close” margin. The only thing that’s close is the divide between people who are against guns in NPs, and those who are for unrestricted carry rights.
July 25th, 2008 at 8:43 am
I dropped by to comment, but I see the G-Man already made my point.
The only way for MSNBC to make it look ‘close’ is to break out the “Yes” into 3 different categories and “No” as one.
July 25th, 2008 at 11:47 am
And you know that when they report the results it will be something along the lines of “More people oppose guns in parks than believe there should be no restrictions” or something along those lines.