reason to love America
Update: Since it was asked, link is mildly NSFW. Definite boob bottoms there. In other news, why is cleavage (tops) OK for news and TeeVee but the bottoms of the boobs are questionable? Hmm.
Update: Since it was asked, link is mildly NSFW. Definite boob bottoms there. In other news, why is cleavage (tops) OK for news and TeeVee but the bottoms of the boobs are questionable? Hmm.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
September 30th, 2008 at 9:31 am
Pornstars for McCain?
September 30th, 2008 at 9:46 am
I’m guessing I probably shouldn’t click on that at work?…
September 30th, 2008 at 10:56 am
Not just the bottoms of the boobs, but the bottoms of the nipples, too.
That being said, I forced myself into researching this young 2nd Amendment proponent, and her web site has a couple of SFW videos of her shooting.
Among other things.
September 30th, 2008 at 11:43 am
The bottoms of breasts are generally considered more risque simply because fewer people show them off. On the other hand, when you start adding the areola, it gets more toward the nippled and dimed store. There’s less space between the bottom side of a breast and the nipple, and the top cleavage and a nipple, so that probably adds to it.
It’s just a cultural taboo — if you go to parts of Africa a few decades ago, there was no taboo on nipples but a major one on legs — but perhaps an understandable one.
September 30th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
Hell, not too long ago in Western history, ankles were horrifically taboo. Go figure.
September 30th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
Gravity and the weight of it on the mind
The tops of boobs are shown in defiance of gravity. Any relaxation of them and they slip lower out of sight. Or at least, reveal nothing more.
Whereas, the bottom of boobs peek out in harmony with gravity. The mind’s eye of the viewer naturally sees that if entropy were not opposed, revelation would be the reward. They threaten that any relaxation of control either by a deep sigh or lifting of the arms in gleeful embrace, they will slip out of their covering and into full view.
It is not what the sight of the bottom of boobs exposes to the eye but what it exposes to the mind of the viewer that makes them taboo.
September 30th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Anyone else see the irony in a porn star preaching her values by saying:
…???
September 30th, 2008 at 6:10 pm
Dunno, but my daughter got an eyeful this morning. She came in to ask me something, and… //shrugs//
My wife wanted to know why I was against her seeing half-ta-ta x2 when I don’t mind her helping me clean my guns.
September 30th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
It’s the Brass Pole Veterans for Truth.
September 30th, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Interesting question with a poor example. On close examination there are nipples present…