Which is exactly why the founders put the words “shall not be infringed.” in the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. Which is also why the “pragmatists” are wrong and we “principles freaks” are right.
Just the kind of “public servant” I like to see get the ax. The recall suggestion is well proposed and I hope some OC people take it up and run with it.
Sandra should maybe take some time to research what a non-danger to the community CCW holders really represent. Of course, she smells like an ideologue so that wouldn’t do much good.
I think this is a follow-on story to the corrupt sheriff who was rewarding his campaign donors with licenses while denying others….
The successor to that bad sheriff decided to revoke “crony licenses” that were being abused, along with designations as deputies, etc., that were granted by the corrupt sheriff.
There is more to the story than is being reported here. Before you condemn, find out more.
October 11th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Which is exactly why the founders put the words “shall not be infringed.” in the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. Which is also why the “pragmatists” are wrong and we “principles freaks” are right.
How much more do you need?
October 11th, 2008 at 7:03 pm
Just the kind of “public servant” I like to see get the ax. The recall suggestion is well proposed and I hope some OC people take it up and run with it.
Sandra should maybe take some time to research what a non-danger to the community CCW holders really represent. Of course, she smells like an ideologue so that wouldn’t do much good.
Throw the lady out.
October 12th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
So does “shall issue” then mean “shall revoke?” 🙂
October 12th, 2008 at 8:35 pm
Yes it does, but the standards for revocation are stricter. Also, may issue means may deny. Shall issue means cannot deny.
All the above assumes no illegal activity by the applicant, except for the Shall deny for cause.
October 12th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
🙂 caught the joke, just had to respond, in case.
October 13th, 2008 at 12:54 am
I think this is a follow-on story to the corrupt sheriff who was rewarding his campaign donors with licenses while denying others….
The successor to that bad sheriff decided to revoke “crony licenses” that were being abused, along with designations as deputies, etc., that were granted by the corrupt sheriff.
There is more to the story than is being reported here. Before you condemn, find out more.