On the Final Debate
The only debate summary you need comes from The American Conservative‘s Daniel Larison. A taste:
Obama repeats his claim that he supports net spending cut. Eliminate programs that don’t work–bold move! These programs are always nameless, which is probably one of the reasons they don’t work. Ethic of responsibility? What? That’s dangerously close to calling on people to accept austerity. McCain is stuttering, and reverts to his litany about energy independence. In the mythical world where we have energy independence, life will be beautiful. Perhaps Aeolus will power the entire grid. Spending freeze! (Obama says that’s a hatchet.) Ethanol is bad; eliminate tariff on Brazilian sugar-based ethanol. Fight the earmarks! What does McCain have against planetariums? McCain wants to use hatchets and scalpels.
Hatchets and scalpels and katanas, oh my!
…snip…
Weird question about the VP candidates from Schieffer. He’s basically asking each candidate to explain why it would be better if he died. Obama: Biden is awesome. Blather, blather, talking points. McCain: Palin is even more awesome. Rehashing the myth of Palin. “A reformer through and through.” McCain wants to get rid of the old boy network in Washington–I have a suggestion how he might help reach that goal. He hasn’t answered the question.
Obama: You can’t help Sarah Palin’s baby with your spending freeze! McCain: Biden was wrong on many foreign policy issues. (That’s true–he has agreed with McCain most of the time.) “Why do we have to spend more?” spake the mortgage bailout king. McCain: Middle Eastern and Venezuelan oil will not be imported when I’m President, because I don’t understand how the oil market works. Apparently Russian oil is okay! Nuclear waste storage is a piece of cake. The litany on energy again. Obama: I agree with John’s crazy 10-year plan. China and Saudi Arabia make their usual guest appearances as foreign villains of the evening.
Read the whole thing for giggles.
October 16th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
You mean a Buchananite isn’t happy with a liberal Republican? Whoda thunk it?
October 16th, 2008 at 10:14 pm
That’d be the Jew-hating Nazi apologist Pat Buchanan’s magazine, right?
October 17th, 2008 at 9:47 am
Yeah, antisemitism is always good for a couple laughs.
October 17th, 2008 at 10:23 am
Yeah, because this author’s posts are just dripping with antisemitism. Sheesh, I thought it was the left who saw racism around every corner…