I read the dissenting opinion, but I honestly don’t see equivalence here. The exact text:
The fact that petitioners received firearms training cannot alone show they are dangerous, unless millions of United States resident citizens who have received firearms training are to be deemed dangerous as well.
I think a key word here is “alone”. I would think that we should agree with this sentiment as stated above.
Note: I’m not defending the rest of the opinion. But I don’t think the judge is making any comparison of jihadists to US citizens with the statement above.
October 23rd, 2008 at 9:40 am
I’d suggest that Judge Roger’s home be seized under imminent domain and used to house these poor souls….
Sheesh!
October 23rd, 2008 at 10:09 am
I guess it’s not all bad, pretty soon we’ll have Micheal Moore heralding us as Freedom Fighters.
October 23rd, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Guantanamo is warm this time of year, but I prefer Hawaii!
October 24th, 2008 at 12:10 am
I read the dissenting opinion, but I honestly don’t see equivalence here. The exact text:
The fact that petitioners received firearms training cannot alone show they are dangerous, unless millions of United States resident citizens who have received firearms training are to be deemed dangerous as well.
I think a key word here is “alone”. I would think that we should agree with this sentiment as stated above.
Note: I’m not defending the rest of the opinion. But I don’t think the judge is making any comparison of jihadists to US citizens with the statement above.