Radical
Robert Schlesinger shows he knows nothing about guns, which is apparently not required to opine on how evil NRA is:
They simply have to register them [arms – ed.], and cannot have any of the semi-automatic variety. Only radical gun rights advocate suggest these are unconstitutional limitations—and if they are unconstitutional, then under-armed D.C. citizens can gain redress through the courts.
I suppose he’s not aware that semi-automatic firearms are the most popular firearms in the country. And are the hottest selling now too. And that’s just radical.
March 11th, 2009 at 11:57 am
“I suppose he’s not aware that semi-automatic firearms are the most popular firearms in the country.”
I’d bet money he knows exactly how common semi-automatic firearms are. That’s the point of gun control, to disarm the people.
March 11th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
“and if they are unconstitutional, then under-armed D.C. citizens can gain redress through the courts.”
I’m cool with that. The Government should issue each voter an M-16, and demand that they maintain it and practice once a month.
Enforce the Militia Act.
Or even better: Buy an M-16 on your own dime, or lose your right to vote.
March 11th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
Schlesinger should be required to be registered to
have his opine published. All journalist should be required to be fingerprinted and registered and licesnsed with each state’s attorney general or face being detained for brandishing (opinining) without a permit. Especially egregious are assault editorials, to be handled with utmost contempt.