The Mexican Gun Canard
A look at Mexican gun laws in action.
Meanwhile, insty notes that the canard of Military hardware flowing into Mexico from the US is being parroted by the press. The LA Times (yes, that LA Times) who is known to shill for any anti-gun cause notes:
Most of these weapons are being smuggled from Central American countries or by sea, eluding U.S. and Mexican monitors who are focused on the smuggling of semiauto- matic and conventional weapons purchased from dealers in the U.S. border states of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California.
Ya think?
March 24th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Wonder what a “conventional weapon” is? Jack.
March 24th, 2009 at 10:42 am
So, if this were to be true, US gun shops are doing good business and Mexicans are killing each other off. What’s not to like about that? Jack.
March 24th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
I’ve saying all along that there are far too many military weapons floating around Central America for the cartels to waste money on U.S. sold semi-autos.
March 25th, 2009 at 12:15 am
The Mexican ambassador to the US (who, oddly, was a British-sounding guy with a middle-eastern sounding last name) was on the News Hour tonight claiming that 90% of the guns they confiscate originated in the United States.
Transcript
Video
Let the deluge of hate mail begin!
There’s a part of me that wonders if both might be true; if the guns originate in the US, but get to Mexico by way of other countries. Still, the story seems to claim that cash and weapons go directly between the two countries.
April 18th, 2009 at 6:02 am
See 4-17-09 Article http://la.indymedia.org/news/2009/04/226162.php
“Charge Americans That Sell Guns To Drug-Dealers With Terrorist-Activity”
NARCO-Terrorists frequently cross into the U.S. from Mexico and have killed Americans.
As drug-gang violence increases in intensity on the U.S./Mexico Border, U.S. gun sales skyrocket. Many Americans fear Congress will pass laws restricting U.S. gun ownership.
During the run up to the 1994 passage of The Federal Assault Weapons Ban, Americans as they are now, stampeded gun stores buying weapons. In 1994 before passage of the “Ban” there was no legal definition what was an “assault weapon.” Gun owners worried the “Ban” could include all semi-automatic firearms, guns that when fired—automatically extract a bullet’s casing and reload the next round into the chamber.
Shortly after the 1994 Assault Weapons “Ban” Passed, Congress proposed a 1-Year shelf life for ammunition sold to the Public. A member of Congress proposed legislation that would prevent Americans stockpiling ammunition: that U.S. Citizens not be allowed to purchase ammunition with a shelf-life longer than twelve months—and ammunition purchased be self-destructing, biodegradable. Subsequently this idea was shelved after dissenters pointed out forcing biodegradable ammunition on Americans would create a black market for foreign ammunition.
In 2009 as in 1994, speculators are buying massive amounts of semi-automatic guns in expectation the government will restrict ownership of those weapons. In 1994 gun-speculators got burnt: the Assault Weapons Ban included a provision that prohibited the sale or transfer of guns listed by the government as “assault weapons.” It is problematic a new gun law passed by Congress might include that transfer ban. Perhaps it would be more effective for U.S. Government to use current terrorist laws to charge Americans that knowingly supply U.S. and Mexico drug gangs with guns.
NARCO-Terrorists frequently cross into the U.S. from Mexico and have killed Americans. Threatening U.S. National Security, illegal drug gangs now operate in 230 U.S. Cities. U.S. Government should charge Americans that knowingly sell weapons to NARCO-Terrorists or their drug distributors, with Terrorist Activity.