If he left a Birkenstock and a granola bar on his front porch, would he be accused of hunting over a baited field if he defended his home against vandalism?
Most biologists not employed by environmental groups think Idaho has too many wolves and the population needs to be reduced.
The current number in the state is around 800, which might not seem like much but is about 700 more than the amount the Feds thought was necessary to keep the wolves from becoming endangered again.
September 4th, 2009 at 1:55 pm
Death threats? Ironic? Or more likely, moronic.
September 4th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
If he left a Birkenstock and a granola bar on his front porch, would he be accused of hunting over a baited field if he defended his home against vandalism?
Regards,
Rabbit.
September 4th, 2009 at 2:07 pm
Death threats are idiotic but only a sick asshole would shoot a wolf these days. Why? Why? Why? Just to kill something?
Does anyone think that we have too many wolves? Or that wolves are good to eat? Or that they are a danger to humans?
Just because you are allowed to do it, doesn’t mean you should do it.
September 4th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Yes, the guy who just shot a wolf is the one you want to make threats to. I just hope no protesters show up wearing Three Wolf Moon Shirts.
September 4th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
If there are too many wolves, they must be culled.
The same should apply to liberals.
September 4th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
Dear nk
Most biologists not employed by environmental groups think Idaho has too many wolves and the population needs to be reduced.
The current number in the state is around 800, which might not seem like much but is about 700 more than the amount the Feds thought was necessary to keep the wolves from becoming endangered again.
Science. You should try it sometime.
September 5th, 2009 at 8:12 am
Sorry, guys. Maybe I read too much Farley Mowat in my formative years.