No fighting in the war room
Or on the internet.
The latest Threeper v. Prag dust up that I wasn’t aware of is summarized by Joe.
Or on the internet.
The latest Threeper v. Prag dust up that I wasn’t aware of is summarized by Joe.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
September 10th, 2009 at 10:16 am
Dr. Strangelove for victory!
September 10th, 2009 at 11:03 am
Dustup is the right term: obfuscation, but nothing of substance. When Caleb starts the discussion off by cussing, you know he’s already three sheets on Red Bull, and it’s downhill from there.
September 10th, 2009 at 12:08 pm
Probably of more interest on the Threeper v. Prag topic is this post.
September 11th, 2009 at 1:56 am
I left a comment on Joe’s site but I couldn’t find it this morning.
I said basically that his description of the “dustup” and the background he provided was wonderfully done. I think it’ll become a reference document of sorts for all who are interested in this subject.
The array of differing opinions and outlooks among the pro-gun folks is fantastic. I only wish the same could be said about the other side.
September 15th, 2009 at 2:03 am
here’s the argument in a nutshell, and a very apt word that is, “nutshell”, I mean.
A prag is someone like Sebastian the eternally melting snowflake. Of course he is melting the heat generated by a principled stand is too hot for him to handle, so he melts to meaninglessness.
It was Sebastian who accused, uh huh, accused, one more time, “ACCUSED”, those of us who cite the constitution and especially the second amendment as the proper stance as regards the right to keep and bear arms as being “principles freaks”. His words, not mine. Who can say anything good about a man who labels those with principles as freaks?
Who among us is so stupid as to believe a man such as that can be trusted? Who among us is so stupid as to believe any of his adherents are trustworthy?
I cannot tell any of you how to think, but I can damn sure tell when you don’t bother to think.