“Source: Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP – Recently, the California Supreme Court in “Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California (2009) 47 Cal.4th 302 ruled that an assertion of self defense by the insured does not convert an intentional attack into an “accident” for coverage under a liability policy.”
September 23rd, 2009 at 11:18 am
Except for the part where he’s misreading the case description to justify the policy that you don’t need.
September 24th, 2009 at 10:11 am
“Source: Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP – Recently, the California Supreme Court in “Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern California (2009) 47 Cal.4th 302 ruled that an assertion of self defense by the insured does not convert an intentional attack into an “accident” for coverage under a liability policy.”