Creating a required service
If all transfers have to go through an FFL, that pretty much ensures some business and probably a cost increase.
2 Responses to “Creating a required service”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
October 13th, 2009 at 9:39 am
Markie Marxist sez: “We’d like to ensure plenty of business for our FFL’s before we nationalize them. Of course, they’re largely nationalized already, since they’re FFL’s. By eliminating the gun show loophole by requiring background checks, which only FFL’s can do, we eliminate the advantage of their unlicensed competitors, private gun owners who are selling guns. Mr. Lisi may be a bit surprised when he’s informed that he’s no longer a private business owner, and is working for the federal government instead, but as an FFL he’s already used to dealing with government and we’ll make it worth his while, at first, that is, until we start shutting down gun stores. Why would a state need more than one gun store? It would just lead to more crime. You don’t want more crime, do you?”
October 13th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
It’s what you do instead of something productive.