Markie Marxist sez: “No private citizen should be allowed to carry a gun. That’s just common sense communism. Any excuse to prevent private gun owners from carrying a gun is a good reason, even if it’s race. That’s not racism, it’s Marxism. Discrimination based on race is only racism when it’s not Marxism. Again, it’s just common communist sense. Marxism trumps all! Ha! Ha! We Marxists rule!”
Only if they’re citizens of “a free State” and not currently convicted and serving time for a criminal offense whereby they were “denied the right to liberty… through due process of law” (5th Amendment)
Not if they really mean they are talking about public safety. It is no secret that black on black crime is the largest crime problem in the nation and leads in the murder category by a wide margin.
Places like Chicago with large minority populations have tried disarming the negro (and everybody else, but everybody else doesn’t post the numbers) and it hasn’t worked. Can Negro Control be far behind? And why wouldn’t the anti-rights crowd be able to justify it, since they have no trouble justifying denying rights to innocents of all colors?
I am just amazed at all the minorities that keep clamoring to go back to the plantations. That is what they are doing when they agree that having their rights stolen in the false name of public safety is acceptable.
Of course, after Negro Control is reinstated, yeah it has been tried before, then there will be Latino Control, then Asian Control (the most law abiding segment of society, but they look funny and are inscrutable) then Caucasian Control. I expect there will be no Muslim Control enacted because the powers that be fear them.
Maybe, that’s the problem? Just saying. Maybe the thugs and politicians (redundancy alert) just don’t fear us enough. Disarming us all will assure they never need to do so.
October 16th, 2009 at 10:05 am
Markie Marxist sez: “No private citizen should be allowed to carry a gun. That’s just common sense communism. Any excuse to prevent private gun owners from carrying a gun is a good reason, even if it’s race. That’s not racism, it’s Marxism. Discrimination based on race is only racism when it’s not Marxism. Again, it’s just common communist sense. Marxism trumps all! Ha! Ha! We Marxists rule!”
October 16th, 2009 at 11:00 am
No, the Negroes should be allowed to carry guns. Plural. At least one for each.
October 16th, 2009 at 2:16 pm
Only if they’re citizens of “a free State” and not currently convicted and serving time for a criminal offense whereby they were “denied the right to liberty… through due process of law” (5th Amendment)
October 17th, 2009 at 1:29 am
Not if they really mean they are talking about public safety. It is no secret that black on black crime is the largest crime problem in the nation and leads in the murder category by a wide margin.
Places like Chicago with large minority populations have tried disarming the negro (and everybody else, but everybody else doesn’t post the numbers) and it hasn’t worked. Can Negro Control be far behind? And why wouldn’t the anti-rights crowd be able to justify it, since they have no trouble justifying denying rights to innocents of all colors?
I am just amazed at all the minorities that keep clamoring to go back to the plantations. That is what they are doing when they agree that having their rights stolen in the false name of public safety is acceptable.
Of course, after Negro Control is reinstated, yeah it has been tried before, then there will be Latino Control, then Asian Control (the most law abiding segment of society, but they look funny and are inscrutable) then Caucasian Control. I expect there will be no Muslim Control enacted because the powers that be fear them.
Maybe, that’s the problem? Just saying. Maybe the thugs and politicians (redundancy alert) just don’t fear us enough. Disarming us all will assure they never need to do so.