One thing the CZ-97 review doesn’t note is that the 97 is a notoriously finicky eater, especially when it comes to hollowpoints. Mine even had issues feeding my Ranier plated round nose handload. Solution is usually polishing the feedramp.
But it beat my Kimber, Sig 220, and USP for accuracy.
Oddly, IPSC rules don’t allow them due to the frame dust cover extending all the way forward.
My CZ97 review here does not have any issues with hollow points neither does it have an issue with SWC. It actually feeds SWC’s better than my S&W 1911. But I have heard from others of this problem but mine does not exhibit that.
October 21st, 2009 at 9:30 am
One thing the CZ-97 review doesn’t note is that the 97 is a notoriously finicky eater, especially when it comes to hollowpoints. Mine even had issues feeding my Ranier plated round nose handload. Solution is usually polishing the feedramp.
But it beat my Kimber, Sig 220, and USP for accuracy.
Oddly, IPSC rules don’t allow them due to the frame dust cover extending all the way forward.
October 25th, 2009 at 5:57 am
My CZ97 review here does not have any issues with hollow points neither does it have an issue with SWC. It actually feeds SWC’s better than my S&W 1911. But I have heard from others of this problem but mine does not exhibit that.