Bushmaster in 7.62
A pic and specs here. I see it comes with a 7.62 specific magazine, which is good. I’ve had 7.62 ARs before and they don’t feed that well. The only magazines I found that were reliable were the ugly Frankenmags. But they were hard to find and expensive. And they were ugly.
Also, a Bushy in 308.
February 15th, 2010 at 11:43 am
If it can take the ammo correctly, I’ll buy it. Have been looking for an ar in 7.62, but have been turned off by the what I have hear about feeding unreliably.
February 15th, 2010 at 1:46 pm
How reliably do the .308 (7.62×51) ARs feed, in y’all’s experience?
February 15th, 2010 at 2:12 pm
C-Products makes a specific magazine for 7.62 x 39 A.R rifles. I bought a used Bushmaster that had been converted. I did have some problems at first, but as each issue was resolved, the rifle became much more dependable. One was the extractor in the bolt assembly was incorrect, replacing that solved the biggest problem of not ejecting every time. The C-Products magazine solved the feed problem and now I have a rifle that is accurate and dependable. http://www.cproductsllc.com
February 16th, 2010 at 12:59 am
Anon Reader Dude Says:
February 15th, 2010 at 1:46 pm
“How reliably do the .308 (7.62×51) ARs feed, in y’all’s experience?”
I own two DPMS .308’s and they both have been 100% reliable feeding ammo from DPMS 19,10 & 4 rnd mags.
I recently put about 35-40 rnds through a Magpul 7.62×51 mag and it was 100% as well.