Strange and unconstitutional
Newspaper told by judge to yank satirical story about a giraffe attack because people think it’s real.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
March 5th, 2010 at 11:00 am
The use of a bulldozer to crush a Styrofoam cup….
March 5th, 2010 at 12:08 pm
Could a dateline of Grover’s Mill, New Jersey, have helped in any way?
This is the Jon Stewart Effect writ large.
March 5th, 2010 at 1:35 pm
The test for a prior restraint (injunction) is clear and present danger. I would countesue the judge, in a suit to abate a private and public nuisance, because she is a clear and present danger.
March 5th, 2010 at 2:01 pm
‘The story is “malicious and untrue,”’
Just like what the media says about gun owners but you dont see any judges demanding that THOSE stories get yanked.
March 6th, 2010 at 2:36 am
Hmm…well, libel (which this might fall under) isn’t really protected by the first amendment.
Problem is, libel is a really hard thing to prove.