Simplifying Carry Laws
TFA’s John Harris in the Tennessean.
The Tennessean disagrees.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
March 24th, 2010 at 12:57 pm
You may notice that their unsigned Editorial is on the front page of their website, while John’s editorial is not.
March 24th, 2010 at 1:42 pm
They represent the progressive side on tennessee know as nashville metro. Step out of the metro area and you are free again. I consider the metro to be a prison lots of crime and violence with few rights.
March 24th, 2010 at 2:48 pm
If they represent the “progressive side”, why are they opposing our enumerated right (Article I, Section 26 Tennessee Declaration of Rights)? But their opposiiton is based on prejudice and bigotry against those, a minority group, who CHOOSE to exercise our basic RIGHT to armed self-defense. Hmmm, I always thought that “progressives” and “liberals” opposed prejudice and bigotry and were “pro-choice”. Obviously NOT!
March 24th, 2010 at 2:56 pm
“Hmmm, I always thought that “progressives” and “liberals” opposed prejudice and bigotry and were “pro-choice”. Obviously NOT!”
They are pro-choice, as long as your choice is something they agree with.
March 24th, 2010 at 4:01 pm
“They are pro-choice, as long as your choice is something they agree with.”-
Huck
And kills only those unable to fight back.
March 24th, 2010 at 4:19 pm
Oh that’s right, “pro-choice” only applies to women being able to choose to kill their unborn child for any and all reasons. But if a woman wants the choice to carry the means to defend her body against a robber, rapist or murderer, then “pro-choice” doesn’t apply. Then they want the hired guns to enforce their unarmed pacifism on everyone else.
And that’s “progressive”, huh?
March 24th, 2010 at 9:15 pm
Well of course they are progressive in their own minds. Speeding up moral decay is progress just not in the right direction. The thing about progressives is that they are never happy no matter what they attain. They always want more. That is known as greed. So Greed = Progressive. That is one reason I never want to be referred to as progressive even on the pro gun side. It is like being and extremist democrat or extremist republican especially seeing that neither side is precisely correct in how they handle things. If you go far enough the lines become blurred as to have no ready difference between the two because they both can become totalitarian ideals. Once you reach that point it becomes moot as to what beliefs you once claimed to have. That is why their are so many progressives can be dangerous regardless of who they represent.