The liberal is right, there. At the least, you are not supposed to bring charges based on what you see when you’re not supposed to be looking. There are less legalistic, and more entertaining, ways of dealing with unwanted nudity.
You know who would have gone down for this? Ben Franklin, that’s who. (I’m grateful for Franklin. He’s gotten me out of some tight spots).
April 8th, 2010 at 10:36 am
A librarian and a stay at home mom. I think the ladies’ real complaint was that he did not invite them inside.
April 8th, 2010 at 11:39 am
She is a Control freak.
Personally I get burned doing stuff in the kitchen in the nude, seems like a dumb idea, but darwin is always looking for new blood.
April 8th, 2010 at 3:04 pm
The librarian heard singing and THEN drove by his house? How close to the house was she, that early in the morning? Sounds like a Peeping Tomette.
April 8th, 2010 at 4:29 pm
As I learned painfully during my college years, and as I have now passed down unto my own college aged son, “Don’t make bacon naked.”
It is a rule that will protect you and others in more situations than attending a solo breakfast.
Sure, coffee seems safer to make in the nude than bacon, right up until somebody gets burned.
We are talking about food here, right?
April 8th, 2010 at 5:50 pm
I would never wear clothes if the choice were mine to make, except that I really wouldn’t subject anyone to such a sickening sight on purpose.
April 8th, 2010 at 7:26 pm
The women should have been arrested for being peeping toms. You are not supposed to look into other peoples houses.
April 8th, 2010 at 11:35 pm
The liberal is right, there. At the least, you are not supposed to bring charges based on what you see when you’re not supposed to be looking. There are less legalistic, and more entertaining, ways of dealing with unwanted nudity.
You know who would have gone down for this? Ben Franklin, that’s who. (I’m grateful for Franklin. He’s gotten me out of some tight spots).