Photography is not a crime
A homeowner says he was arrested for “illegal photography” when a police sergeant followed him into his own home, and he objected and took the cop’s photo with his cell phone.
6 Responses to “Photography is not a crime”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
June 25th, 2010 at 11:51 am
He was also arrested for “public intoxication” inside his own home.
http://carlosmiller.com/2010/06/21/texas-man-suing-over-illegal-photography-arrest/
June 25th, 2010 at 4:14 pm
The real brain cramp is being charged with both public intoxication and illegal photography, which only applies if there’s an expectation of privacy.
Apparently this is some weird Schroedinger’s Police Officer that is capable of being simultaneously in-public and not-in-public.
June 25th, 2010 at 5:56 pm
There was a nc pistol possession case like that near where my parents live in nc. Seems the officer arrested the suspect because he was concealing a pistol in his car. When it got to court the defense questioned the officer about how he knew there was a pistol inside the locked car. He said he saw it sticking up between the console and drivers seat. The case was dismissed immediately with prejudice.
June 26th, 2010 at 12:44 am
Think they’ll settle for $250, 000. My advice? take the money and move away from Hooterville.
June 26th, 2010 at 12:32 pm
There was a case in WI, like the one John Smith mentioned, the difference the guy was found guilty of having a concealed weapon for the gun that was sitting on the passenger seat of his car.
June 27th, 2010 at 9:00 am
because there are never any sober people in Wi.