Although I can see the humor it’s not a very wise thing to do. In nearly all juridictions the use of deadly force to prevent simple property loss is against the law. Publically stating that will increase the risk of prosecution if there is a shooting where deadly force probably was justified.
Or as my friend Sean is fond of saying, “That statement may come up at your trial.”
When a juvenile thug gets shot, the DA will charge the defender with delinquency of a minor for exposing a youth to such inappropriate language (in addition to felony self defense, or whatever liberal DA’s like to call it).
September 2nd, 2010 at 10:35 am
Although I can see the humor it’s not a very wise thing to do. In nearly all juridictions the use of deadly force to prevent simple property loss is against the law. Publically stating that will increase the risk of prosecution if there is a shooting where deadly force probably was justified.
Or as my friend Sean is fond of saying, “That statement may come up at your trial.”
September 2nd, 2010 at 10:36 am
Yep, mouth shut.
September 2nd, 2010 at 10:41 am
Of course if he does find it necessary to shoot a burglar, this sign will be cited as proof of premeditation.
September 2nd, 2010 at 5:31 pm
When a juvenile thug gets shot, the DA will charge the defender with delinquency of a minor for exposing a youth to such inappropriate language (in addition to felony self defense, or whatever liberal DA’s like to call it).