Yes, times are definitely changing. Yet I’m having a hard time understanding a deadly force justification for somebody throwing a brick through a window. At what point was her life in danger?
I think it could be argued that whipping a brick at another human being is a threat of death or serious bodily injury.
The shootee had threatened her life, had oommitted arson against her (burned a grill on her patio), and was standing on a shed on the curtilage when shot.
This neighborhood in Chicago is of the semi-enclosed brownstones variety and you have to walk onto the property in order to access the front door.
“…I’m having a hard time understanding a deadly force justification for somebody throwing a brick through a window. At what point was her life in danger?”
Ever been hit by a brick? I have, by accident no less, and it’s no picnic. It’s serious business, make no mistake, with any number of potential injuries from broken bones, loss of teeth or an eye, serious scaring, concussion and death. I was incredibly lucky to avoid the worst, and I was a healthy young man, not a fragile 68 year old woman.
That young and wild animal was (and probably still is) on the road to much worse trouble. Takes a village…? Damn right. When you see anyone—young or old—doing something wrong, bawl him/her out, don’t turn away and pretend it’s not your problem, because it definitely is. When you see him endangering a life, put him/her down.
September 30th, 2010 at 10:45 am
Given the circumstances this is simply amazing.
The State’s Attorney is gun shy after McDonald!
September 30th, 2010 at 10:55 am
The times they are a changin!
September 30th, 2010 at 11:32 am
I wrote about that one yesterday (http://www.gunsandammoblog.com/?p=801). Great to see some sense in Chicagoland finally.
September 30th, 2010 at 12:27 pm
Yes, times are definitely changing. Yet I’m having a hard time understanding a deadly force justification for somebody throwing a brick through a window. At what point was her life in danger?
September 30th, 2010 at 12:39 pm
“At what point was her life in danger?”
I think it could be argued that whipping a brick at another human being is a threat of death or serious bodily injury.
The shootee had threatened her life, had oommitted arson against her (burned a grill on her patio), and was standing on a shed on the curtilage when shot.
This neighborhood in Chicago is of the semi-enclosed brownstones variety and you have to walk onto the property in order to access the front door.
September 30th, 2010 at 2:59 pm
“…I’m having a hard time understanding a deadly force justification for somebody throwing a brick through a window. At what point was her life in danger?”
Ever been hit by a brick? I have, by accident no less, and it’s no picnic. It’s serious business, make no mistake, with any number of potential injuries from broken bones, loss of teeth or an eye, serious scaring, concussion and death. I was incredibly lucky to avoid the worst, and I was a healthy young man, not a fragile 68 year old woman.
That young and wild animal was (and probably still is) on the road to much worse trouble. Takes a village…? Damn right. When you see anyone—young or old—doing something wrong, bawl him/her out, don’t turn away and pretend it’s not your problem, because it definitely is. When you see him endangering a life, put him/her down.
September 30th, 2010 at 11:31 pm
Stoning was historically a death sentence. Heaving a brick at someone is assault with a deadly. Not to mention the arson, etc.