@Shootin’ Buddy – yep. that’s the way it works. I’m hoping that we say it often enough that even the less well informed figure it out.
@Bubblehead – I’m not sure that she’s capable of understanding the difference.
In any case, tomorrow I show you the percentage of total murders where the relationship is either unknown, or they are total strangers. Hint, it’s more than 50%
November 8th, 2010 at 10:01 am
My favorite is the “known to the victim” number.
Yes, Crack Dealer A may likely know Crack Dealer B . . . and then put a cap in that ass.
November 8th, 2010 at 12:21 pm
What’s that quote? “Lies, damn lies and statistics!” Guess that’s how Peterson makes the quote true.
November 8th, 2010 at 1:35 pm
Grammar! It is ‘who killed whom.’ The extra ‘m’ is for murder.
November 8th, 2010 at 5:23 pm
Thanks for the link.
@Shootin’ Buddy – yep. that’s the way it works. I’m hoping that we say it often enough that even the less well informed figure it out.
@Bubblehead – I’m not sure that she’s capable of understanding the difference.
In any case, tomorrow I show you the percentage of total murders where the relationship is either unknown, or they are total strangers. Hint, it’s more than 50%