Wait, the schools have police?
Schools is facing budget cuts. The press is shocked that the school police are buying AR-15s, $130 belt buckles and $400 dress blouses. I’m more surprised that the schools actually have a police department.
Schools is facing budget cuts. The press is shocked that the school police are buying AR-15s, $130 belt buckles and $400 dress blouses. I’m more surprised that the schools actually have a police department.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
Find Local
|
March 1st, 2011 at 12:09 pm
what the hell? When I was in public school (not too long ago) we had one or two armed state police serving as SRO’s. They carried Sigs.
March 1st, 2011 at 12:15 pm
“And we know from the Columbine incident that students can get hold of fully automatic assault rifles and bring them to school,” adds Carolyn Edwards, President of the Clark County Board of School Trustees.
::eyeroll::
March 1st, 2011 at 12:17 pm
jason beat me to it. Layers of editorial oversight.
March 1st, 2011 at 12:28 pm
It’s a direct quote. Unless you’re saying that Carolyn Edwards didn’t say that, I fail to understand what editorial oversight has to do with it. Would be nice if the writer said that she didn’t know what Edwards was talking about, but…
March 1st, 2011 at 12:33 pm
I was pretty sure fact-checking is part of the editorial process. The quote should have either a)not been included or b)been followed by a factual correction.
Option A would have been the preferred choice for everyone.
March 1st, 2011 at 1:08 pm
Uncle, you hit it on the big picture. Dump the school police department. And tell the parents what police are supposed to do in an emergency… come clean up after bad people do things to defenseless sheep.
March 1st, 2011 at 1:22 pm
Police corruption… Yes I know it is a double negative.
March 1st, 2011 at 1:39 pm
I don’t mind the AR-15s. But I bet the rest is part of ‘SWAT’ gear.
Yea schools really need a SWAT team, to sit there and wait till the killers have ran out of bullets before moving in.
March 1st, 2011 at 2:27 pm
“I’m more surprised that the schools actually have a police department.”
…and a school police union.
March 1st, 2011 at 2:36 pm
Hey, you can’t have a zero tolerance policy against self defense if you don’t have a written policy on what the school police will do if there is a fight in the cafeteria or a mad gunman running down the halls. Otherwise, you might get taken to court by the victim of a bully and lose.
March 1st, 2011 at 5:09 pm
When do the Stingers and the Bearcat arrive? What no air support? Lightweights. Come on really our prisons need the best gear…wait school police?
March 1st, 2011 at 7:20 pm
“And we know from the Columbine incident that students can get hold of fully automatic assault rifles and bring them to school,” adds Carolyn Edwards, President of the Clark County Board of School Trustees.
::eyeroll::
I would not be so polite with my reaction but I’m trying to clean up my language!
Oh! What the heck?, I’ll just call her a moron and be done with it!
March 1st, 2011 at 9:20 pm
I’m curious as to how many of these “school officers” could hit a target under stress with their “training” ARs. Or do they just want them to intimidate students? Increasingly, modern police tend to be swaggering, insecure buttholes with all the charm of used tampons. This is a trend that badly needs reversal. The soultion, of course, is to cut their budgets and make security more of a personal-responsibilty issue.
March 1st, 2011 at 9:21 pm
Er…”solution”, rather. Oops.
March 1st, 2011 at 10:05 pm
Do those “semi-automatic assault rifles” come with “Big Bullet-Busting Boxes”?
March 1st, 2011 at 11:28 pm
They used to have NO police, then they had city police, now our school system has it’s own police force so they don’t have to report crimes into any system but their own.