“We’ve probably allowed more guns into the country than guns we’ve stopped”
So says an ATF agent. Yeah, it’s the same reference as below but I thought that warranted a separate post.
9 Responses to ““We’ve probably allowed more guns into the country than guns we’ve stopped””
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
March 8th, 2011 at 1:49 pm
ATF agent a year from now: “Hey, I have an idea!
Let’s give some Muslims some enriched uranium and track where they take it. Maybe it will lead to a major bust.”
March 8th, 2011 at 2:20 pm
So the basic gist is we let guns into mexico to show that we need more funding to stop guns from going into mexico??? Circular reasoning….
March 8th, 2011 at 3:07 pm
It’s not circular reasoning, it’s attempted fraud – the key was to not let anyone find out about it. “We don’t know where all these guns are coming from, because we don’t have enough money to do the investigation properly! Please increase our funding!”
They don’t need more money, they need to be prosecuted.
March 8th, 2011 at 4:17 pm
Kristopher , sounds like some of the plot of the Overton Window novel.
March 8th, 2011 at 5:01 pm
Maybe they need the money to go after the alcohol and tobacco. “There’s still a lot sinners hereabouts” as The Preacher said in “Pale Rider”.
March 8th, 2011 at 5:23 pm
The Feds put up a sign 100 miles south of here telling Americans not to go near their own border. I thought it was only right that we should respond in kind:
http://www.exurbanleague.com/Home/tabid/40/EntryId/1008/Fed-Up.aspx
March 8th, 2011 at 5:59 pm
The kid who killed his parents asks for leniency because he’s an orphan – and for a bigger allowance.
March 8th, 2011 at 7:27 pm
ExurbanKevin Says:
“The Feds put up a sign 100 miles south of here telling Americans not to go near their own border.”
Is that in Arizona? According to reports, part of Arizona is UNDER OCCUPATION because our own government refuses to “protect the States against invasion” and refuses according to its DUTY in Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution. According to an objective reading of Article III, Section 3, of the Constitution, that is “treason”.
March 8th, 2011 at 11:25 pm
So if it’s under occupation, is that still murder or is it insurgency? Is it serving in the militia loyally? What is it?