The local Average is nice to know, but the interesting bits in a subject like this are the values of the local Standard Deviation, the Median, and the Max and Min.
Just how homogeneous a society is Japan, and how much a melting pot is the US?
I seriously doubt the accuracy of any study on this subject. Its not like men with small dicks would be eager to participate. And, of course, nobody would ever lie about such measurements, would they?
Hmmm…if size matters, and men are being marketed to (this is an obvious marketing device) under the presumption that bigger men = happier women (as far as sexual pleasure is concerned) then when will we see the opposite? I mean really, if women wanna have that “totally filled” feeling that only Godzilla or a New England brown moose can provide, I submit that the problem isn’t the lack of size of males in the population, but the overabundance of women who could hangar a Boeing 727 or a DC 10.
A much better map would be one of worldwide vaginal size, both in depth and maximum diameter capacity, so that men could know which women will be easiest to pleasure. ie: if bigger=better for men equates to “filling thine cup to overflowing for maximum pleasure”, then dang it, there should be a map showing more “snug fitting” women, as they will be the most easily pleasured.
I don’t have a copy immediately at hand, but the landmark research was done and published in a textbook named “Endocrinology”. Penis size is a secondary sexual characteristic, mainly driven by blood testosterone levels (fetal, pre-puberty and during puberty).
The main positive driver is consumption of meat and milk. Height is a good surrogate for penis size.
Boys with high levels of testosterone tend to be more aggressive, and to be more athletic. Aggressiveness and athleticism are weak surrogates for penis size.
The main negative driver of penis growth during development is body fat (putatively the fat cells produce estrogen, which counter-acts the testosterone).
A world wide vaginal size map won’t work. A vagina is a potential space stretching to accommodate objects (like a baby). No human male is hung the size of a human baby so not a viable test. BTW only the first 1/3rd of the vagina is innervated, past that your wasting your time.
March 23rd, 2011 at 9:49 am
I really mess up the average for my area.
March 23rd, 2011 at 10:22 am
The local Average is nice to know, but the interesting bits in a subject like this are the values of the local Standard Deviation, the Median, and the Max and Min.
Just how homogeneous a society is Japan, and how much a melting pot is the US?
March 23rd, 2011 at 11:01 am
I seriously doubt the accuracy of any study on this subject. Its not like men with small dicks would be eager to participate. And, of course, nobody would ever lie about such measurements, would they?
March 23rd, 2011 at 11:36 am
I think they must jump from inches to centimeters depending on the country…
March 23rd, 2011 at 11:40 am
DirtCrashr: Mine jumps from centimeters to inches, ifyouknowwhatI’msayin’
*snort*
March 23rd, 2011 at 11:47 am
I noticed that Venezuela is listed as “larger than average” country. I guess that makes Hugo Chavez an even dick than we thought.
March 23rd, 2011 at 11:50 am
I wonder — did they actually have a random sample? And did they measure, or just ask the subjects?
Until those questions are answered, I’ll just take this map as indicating the depth of macho bullshit.
March 23rd, 2011 at 11:52 am
Shouldn’t this be a relief map?
March 23rd, 2011 at 11:56 am
Winner anon!
March 23rd, 2011 at 12:02 pm
Oh the map data is in cm! Thank God. For a minute there I thought I was going to have to go out and buy a bigger gun.
March 23rd, 2011 at 12:18 pm
Hmmm…if size matters, and men are being marketed to (this is an obvious marketing device) under the presumption that bigger men = happier women (as far as sexual pleasure is concerned) then when will we see the opposite? I mean really, if women wanna have that “totally filled” feeling that only Godzilla or a New England brown moose can provide, I submit that the problem isn’t the lack of size of males in the population, but the overabundance of women who could hangar a Boeing 727 or a DC 10.
A much better map would be one of worldwide vaginal size, both in depth and maximum diameter capacity, so that men could know which women will be easiest to pleasure. ie: if bigger=better for men equates to “filling thine cup to overflowing for maximum pleasure”, then dang it, there should be a map showing more “snug fitting” women, as they will be the most easily pleasured.
March 23rd, 2011 at 12:53 pm
Anon, having no future in this world, can spell “hangar.”
Ubi sunt, who remembers Dick Siegel’s “Downsize Blues”?
March 23rd, 2011 at 1:30 pm
I don’t have a copy immediately at hand, but the landmark research was done and published in a textbook named “Endocrinology”. Penis size is a secondary sexual characteristic, mainly driven by blood testosterone levels (fetal, pre-puberty and during puberty).
The main positive driver is consumption of meat and milk. Height is a good surrogate for penis size.
Boys with high levels of testosterone tend to be more aggressive, and to be more athletic. Aggressiveness and athleticism are weak surrogates for penis size.
The main negative driver of penis growth during development is body fat (putatively the fat cells produce estrogen, which counter-acts the testosterone).
March 23rd, 2011 at 2:54 pm
Size seems to have an inverse relationship to the average temperature. Maybe you really can freeze it off.
March 23rd, 2011 at 5:42 pm
Don’t go to jail in the Sudan.
March 23rd, 2011 at 5:47 pm
A world wide vaginal size map won’t work. A vagina is a potential space stretching to accommodate objects (like a baby). No human male is hung the size of a human baby so not a viable test. BTW only the first 1/3rd of the vagina is innervated, past that your wasting your time.
March 23rd, 2011 at 6:39 pm
We’re supposed to believe that the French are bigger than Americans?
Right.
March 23rd, 2011 at 7:29 pm
OMG, I think I just found my G-spot…….
March 24th, 2011 at 11:39 am
So then East Asia must have a higher rate of private gun ownership than the U.S.?
March 24th, 2011 at 6:09 pm
Check out who is running the site. Now do a search for average U.S. size. Looks like a penis pill scam to me.