Immunity and why it sucks
DA’s office sat on evidence that would prove a man’s innocence for 14 years while he was on death row. The man cannot sue for that.
8 Responses to “Immunity and why it sucks”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
March 30th, 2011 at 9:40 am
It this man went and killed the prosecutor would that be ruled self defence than??? The prosecutor tried to have him murdered via the state… I say time served if he does…
March 30th, 2011 at 11:01 am
If I was on the jury, I would give him self defense for that.
March 30th, 2011 at 1:56 pm
This, I believe, is what tar and feathers are for
March 30th, 2011 at 2:01 pm
Nobody should be a King.
March 30th, 2011 at 3:07 pm
I’d agree with comment 1 and 2.
March 30th, 2011 at 4:50 pm
John Smith,
I’d give him a big fat “NOT GUILTY” and a big FU to the prosecution.
March 30th, 2011 at 7:18 pm
I would call it justifiable homicide!!!
Killing that prosecutor would make him a public benefactor.
March 31st, 2011 at 1:22 am
Once again, the Supreme Court makes a horrible ruling. This is up there with Kelo vs City of New London.