Well slap my ass and call me Sally, we may end up being able to own stun guns in Michigan, or they’ll end up double plus illegal. Interesting either way.
Still with that whole regulation thing and completely ignoring the shall not be infringed part….. Can one regulate in the manner that the manner that the wod is used today, without infringing?
I just wish the Plaintiff did not have 2 Felony Convictions. I can see that the Appellate Courts would deny him the Right to Carry because of the Felonies, rather than Stun Guns being Arms themselves. Oh well, we’ll see how this plays out.
April 22nd, 2011 at 5:00 pm
Well slap my ass and call me Sally, we may end up being able to own stun guns in Michigan, or they’ll end up double plus illegal. Interesting either way.
April 22nd, 2011 at 6:53 pm
Still with that whole regulation thing and completely ignoring the shall not be infringed part….. Can one regulate in the manner that the manner that the wod is used today, without infringing?
April 22nd, 2011 at 8:25 pm
I just wish the Plaintiff did not have 2 Felony Convictions. I can see that the Appellate Courts would deny him the Right to Carry because of the Felonies, rather than Stun Guns being Arms themselves. Oh well, we’ll see how this plays out.
April 22nd, 2011 at 8:54 pm
No language about “muzzle-loading, period correct, pre-1899” stun guns?
what wonderful news!
April 22nd, 2011 at 9:24 pm
Released yesterday:
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/7201-railroading-of-walter-reddy-patriots-legally-owned-guns-seized
April 24th, 2011 at 10:21 am
A period-correct stun gun would be a kite with a key, right? Those things are dangerous.
April 25th, 2011 at 11:18 am
What about the sporting purpose of stun guns?