I told you
Said before I thought it sounded full-auto. I was right. It was illegally converted.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
October 6th, 2011 at 10:00 am
Just wondering why it took a month to tell everyone that it wasn’t a Factory Job.
October 6th, 2011 at 12:19 pm
I couldn’t get the link to work.What I find funny is I don’t think there was much media attention given to this incident.Which was a good thing.Some media outlets I’m sure would have turned the facts.
October 6th, 2011 at 2:03 pm
An article that says you need an FFL to modify a rifle to a machinegun is not one I’m likely to listen to about details.
You don’t need a damn FFL (federal firearms license, per the article) to make or own NFA items. Due to the nice Hughs amendment, you do need to be an SOT to make machineguns.
But a tax stamp is not an FFL, and while you generally need an FFL to be an SOT, they aren’t the same thing either.
So maybe it’s a machinegun, maybe it’s not. But they sure don’t have a good grasp of the laws they are talking about.