I’d give ten to one odds that regardless of how much “fun” she had shooting with Scalia, she will still come down on the holder/obumble side on any issue brought before her.
Stricts crutiny is the only possible standard of judicial review for an enumerated right, otherwise there are no such things as rights. Kagan can enjoy her experiences all she wants, she is still unlikely to apply strict scrutiny based on her liberal leftist progressive elitist ideology.
Yeah; plenty of rabid antis have had fun shooting. The saying “Good for me but not for thee” exists for a reason.
What does being Jewish have to do with anything? That seemed out of place and silly. One would think that Jews would be more sharply aware of the need for self defense and defense against tyranny than most folks.
October 21st, 2011 at 9:27 am
This should have the tag, “We’re winning.”
October 21st, 2011 at 9:59 am
I’d give ten to one odds that regardless of how much “fun” she had shooting with Scalia, she will still come down on the holder/obumble side on any issue brought before her.
October 21st, 2011 at 12:02 pm
I am touched that Harry Reid’s protege likes hunting.
But I believe that she is no friend of the 2A and that she doesn’t believe our citizens should be able to carry weapons for self-protection.
October 21st, 2011 at 4:00 pm
Stricts crutiny is the only possible standard of judicial review for an enumerated right, otherwise there are no such things as rights. Kagan can enjoy her experiences all she wants, she is still unlikely to apply strict scrutiny based on her liberal leftist progressive elitist ideology.
October 21st, 2011 at 8:14 pm
Yeah; plenty of rabid antis have had fun shooting. The saying “Good for me but not for thee” exists for a reason.
What does being Jewish have to do with anything? That seemed out of place and silly. One would think that Jews would be more sharply aware of the need for self defense and defense against tyranny than most folks.