Ammo For Sale

« « Joint Concealed Carry Database | Home | Gun Porn » »

That shooting ban on federal land

Not gonna happen

5 Responses to “That shooting ban on federal land”

  1. Lyle Says:

    Better not.

  2. Kristopher Says:

    I want to know why half of those Pitmann-Robertson taxes aren’t spent on target ranges on BLM and Forest Service lands.

    Every BLM And National Forest district should be maintaining at least one range. If you want to prevent issues with recreational shooting, then dig out a shooting pit, and swamp the trash out once in a while.

    And encourage shooters to arrest assholes who dump trash there.

  3. Bobby Says:

    That sounds like the perfectly logical arguement that happens all the time by me about rscetracks/drag strips. They closed them all on Long Island, and then get pissed when people race on the street…

  4. comatus Says:

    The original Vanderbilt Cup course, the Long Island Motor Parkway, and Bridgehampton would all be national cultural sites, if we still had a culture. Oh yeah, and West Islip too. That other culture.

    So, offer us a total ban, relent, then close, oh, say a third. The art of the possible. Your pro-gun congressman will claim ‘victory!’ in his fundraiser.

  5. mikee Says:

    Comatus is correct.

    As an example of how this works, here in Austin the Walmart corporation wanted to put in 4 stores around the city. They went to the city council and proposed 5, with one sitting atop a very ecologically sensitive aquifer recharge zone. Enviros screamed and shouted, councilpersons ranted, talk radio fulminated, etc., etc., and eventually just before the court cases started Walmart relented and grudgingly changed their plan to ONLY FOUR stores, which city council grandly approved, to the public acclaim of enviros, themselves, talk radio, etc..

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives