Pedophiles
Readers may recall that I used to work with sexual offenders, until I realized they were better off dead. So, I know a thing or two about them. Not an expert by any means and this was years ago. Child molesters are attracted to children. If you ask them, as I have, why they like kids, they will respond with things like pudgy cheeks, small bodies, large eyes, and other things characteristic of children. Not the child’s gender. Most of them had molested both genders. But not all. Most started with the same gender because they were convenient targets (i.e., mom not afraid to leave a boy alone with a male, but moms may not leave their daughter alone with one). That doesn’t make them gay. It also doesn’t make them straight. It makes them child molesters. I see the presumption that child molesters molesting same sex children means they’re gay enough in light of the recent school and sports scandals. The flip to David’s question there would be the presumption that straight people would be attracted to same sex children. But they’re not. If they’re normal.
December 7th, 2011 at 1:30 pm
Really does not matter which gender they molest, but if the child is less than 13 they are better off dead
December 7th, 2011 at 2:36 pm
Agree, they are more “pan-sexual” than homo or hetreo.
December 7th, 2011 at 3:27 pm
A few years ago I would have agreed with you, unc.
Having lived on a majority gtlb street for the last five years
has opened my eyes.
After a few bottles of wine at a neighborhood party, someone asked, ” where do little gay boys come from?” All the me said they discovered their sexuality at a young age. Several of their experiences included a bj/ hj/ backdooring by an adult male. Did this cause their orientation or did their orientation attract this attention? I don’t know but I think the subject is less than cut and dried.
December 7th, 2011 at 4:13 pm
Let’s not argue with “Why” or “How”, or “what” they are. Let’s just cure them with bullets.
Seriously when I do a “Gun Death?” story where somebody beats an infant to death, or molests a child, or rapes an old woman in a nursing home, we’re not dealing with what I would generally consider human.
Real people don’t have reactions to other people like this…and that happens to make them dangerous. I can’t think that can be repaired. And for those of us who DO behave ourselves I find it a bit insulting we waste so much time trying to do what is likely impossible.
December 7th, 2011 at 6:03 pm
Unc, I think you are missing the bigger point, but it isn’t your fault, you are the victim of a bait and switch.
Flash back to the Catholic “Pedophile” scandal. The majority of the “Pedophile Priests” were actually having sex with teen boys. They weren’t assaulting babies and children. Remember how the Church dealt with the one actual child molester that they found. Defrocked, Convicted, and tossed in jail.
If a man had sex with a girl in the 15 to 17 range, he would not be considered a pedophile, he would be charged with statutory rape. So if a man has sex with a boy 15-17, why would anyone call that pedophilia? That is simply homosexual behavior, but directed towards people that are not yet legally allowed to consent.
The Catholic Church did a bait and switch. They called it pedophilia, chucked out the one actual pedophile, and then basically ignored the stat rape cases.
Not being gay myself, I have no idea how widespread it is to have desires for underage men. I am sure every straight man has looked at a hot chick and said, “yep, i’d do her,” and then found out she was underage.
The point is, we are talking about two separate categories of crime. Pedophilia, and stat rape. We should not be confusing the two.
December 7th, 2011 at 11:51 pm
So is pedophilia an orientation or a fetish?
December 8th, 2011 at 10:16 pm
It is just another degenerate life style. Same foundation just varying degrees and horror as the other common degenerate sexual problems people pursue homosexuals, bestiality, sadism, incest, etc..
All such should be banned and shunned from the acceptance of the public spear, although the latter mentioned should not be illegal as they don’t harm anyone short the ones involved. People who abuse children should be killed once found guilty. Nothing can repair or remove the damage done to that child but at least with the offenders death the next or more child/dren will be saved.
Sad fact of our society is that our major crimes have a 90% repeat rate. Seems someone could do some simply math and realize over 90% of our major crime rate would be eliminated in just one generation cycle, if the death penalty was restored and actually used. Kiddie abuse, rape, murder 1 (not manslaughter or self defense), all should be death penalty items.
December 8th, 2011 at 11:31 pm
I was a C.O. with the Richmond (VA) City Sheriff’s Dept.
There were life forms that passed though our gates that had no business drawing breath.
What can you do with a guy that sells his own 12 year old sister?
Or the 17 year old that NAILED his 78 year old rape victim to the kitchen chair before he torched the house?
Come the collapse we’re going to have lots more to worry ’bout than 401s, Wall Street or #OWS dweebs (they’ll provide interesting fodder for the BOTTOM 1%).