Another NFA Hack
14 inch 12ga shotgun that is not an NFA item.
More here.
Gun manufacturing laws are quite ridiculous and manipulated by ATF a lot. Nice to see the rules being bent the other way.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
December 29th, 2011 at 11:35 am
I know what Jay G will be buying next!
December 29th, 2011 at 11:51 am
Heh…
I was *JUST* thinking that…
December 29th, 2011 at 12:37 pm
I believe their is actually a shoulder holster for these types of pistols…
December 29th, 2011 at 12:51 pm
And another win for those of us in states that don’t require concealment anyway 🙂
December 29th, 2011 at 1:26 pm
But don’t paint the muzzle orange and then open-carry it in a public park!
December 29th, 2011 at 1:41 pm
Of course given the bore size of a 12gauge couldn’t they rule it not a sporting firearm in which case it becomes a destructive device?
December 29th, 2011 at 3:26 pm
I Don’t know Jeffery.. Does anything over 50 cal. have to have a RIFLED barrel to be a DD?
December 29th, 2011 at 3:49 pm
At one time, these short barrel, pistol grip shotguns were classified as AOW (Any Other Weapon).
December 29th, 2011 at 4:26 pm
No it doesn’t have to be a rifled barrel. The street sweeper shotgun was reclassified a DD given the “lack of sporting purpose.”
December 29th, 2011 at 5:18 pm
Uncle – FWIW, the OP you linked to has edited my original comment. I made reference to constructive intent and the potential legal issues of possessing both the 14″ configuration as pictured and a bone-stock Mossberg 500 in the same place.
My final line was, “Neat. Pass.”
I have since commented asking them to simply remove my comment, instead of editing it to say something I did not say.
December 29th, 2011 at 7:46 pm
“Constructive intent” wouldn’t play into it, as all the items in your scenario would have a legal use. Constructive intent only applies when there is no legal use for a combination of items. Thompson proved this in their case with the Contender setup with both a long and short barrel and a pistol grip and a stock–and only one receiver.
January 4th, 2012 at 10:51 am
Hm.
Neat.
Better than a pistol grip. I put one on an 870, fired one magazine through it, and my mitt hurts from thinking about it. Now, hip-firing a shotgun with the regular stock isn’t bad.
Looks like a handy device for things going “bump” in the night.
I’d prefer a double with hammers or even a single, but that’s just me…the 14″ toob just looks so much handier for being inside a dwelling.
My opinion, a double negates 2nd hand needed to pump, which may be struggling with the noisemaker, and if you can’t pump it why have more than one shot or two? Have a pistol for backup.
Just my theory. The whole “bunker down and call 911” doesn’t work when one has a munchkin to secure, in likely direction of nighttime noise, and therefore, one hand may be securing them, so other with a large blaster may be a better idea.