I will begin retrofitting the gutters for hot oil dispersal after the New Years… or maybe I’ll just clean the fallen leaves out once again.
Don’t storm my front door if you don’t want to know which one got done. Nah, just kidding. I’ll stick to more modern defensive weaponry, like they used on MacGuyver.
And regarding the article, the final paragraphs represent some really dense inaccuracies regarding Castle Doctrine law, unless PA law is really effin’ weird.
Mikee, PA Law is weird. They have “Open Carry” as State Law, with the exception of Philadelphia, which somehow a Citizen of that Particular City can be Crucified if they have their CCW Gun accidentally revealed by a gust of Wind. And they JUST got Castle Doctrine.
So the pertinent issue in the case discussed was the intruder’s lack of permission to enter the property, not the threats he had delivered, nor the club he was wielding? I think the reporter summarized some police info into gobbledegook that missed the most pertinent point: the intruder was attacking the homeowner with a deadly weapon, after threatening to kill the homeowner.
December 29th, 2011 at 10:58 am
Given the name of the doctrine, bow and arrow seems even more appropriate.
December 29th, 2011 at 12:11 pm
I will begin retrofitting the gutters for hot oil dispersal after the New Years… or maybe I’ll just clean the fallen leaves out once again.
Don’t storm my front door if you don’t want to know which one got done. Nah, just kidding. I’ll stick to more modern defensive weaponry, like they used on MacGuyver.
And regarding the article, the final paragraphs represent some really dense inaccuracies regarding Castle Doctrine law, unless PA law is really effin’ weird.
December 29th, 2011 at 1:06 pm
Mikee, PA Law is weird. They have “Open Carry” as State Law, with the exception of Philadelphia, which somehow a Citizen of that Particular City can be Crucified if they have their CCW Gun accidentally revealed by a gust of Wind. And they JUST got Castle Doctrine.
December 29th, 2011 at 1:26 pm
So the pertinent issue in the case discussed was the intruder’s lack of permission to enter the property, not the threats he had delivered, nor the club he was wielding? I think the reporter summarized some police info into gobbledegook that missed the most pertinent point: the intruder was attacking the homeowner with a deadly weapon, after threatening to kill the homeowner.
December 29th, 2011 at 10:29 pm
What about a saber or katana?
December 29th, 2011 at 10:31 pm
Chainsaw?