Romney on guns
He has a position statement on his site. Via Jacob, who notes It’s just words with no substance. So, it’s just like Romney?
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
February 17th, 2012 at 2:33 pm
I don’t just have substance. I have body and style.
February 17th, 2012 at 2:54 pm
I think having someone with an absolute disinterest in firearms legislation is just fine, and a heck of a lot better than a rabid anti-gunner like our current President Fast & Furious.
If you have Romney in office, he most likely won’t fight against or veto pro-gun legislation the Republican House and/or Senate might send him – exactly because he doesn’t care about it.
Sometimes not caring is an OK thing.
February 17th, 2012 at 2:56 pm
Romney’s hair, I see your substance, body and style and raise you a threatening snarl.
February 17th, 2012 at 3:38 pm
“It’s just words with no substance.”
Yeah, that’s Romney all right.
February 17th, 2012 at 3:43 pm
I’ll see your snarl and stomp off angrily, shaking things.
February 17th, 2012 at 4:31 pm
Just in case he wins I registered the domain names romneyshair.com and mittshair.com. Someone already owned mittromneyshair.com.
February 18th, 2012 at 9:31 pm
He is a Mitt late on this issue. I had noted earlier that his website Issues page was devoid of the 2A. I am not buying it. Damn the Republican Party. Damn them to some form of Democrat hell–but, the Democrats don’t believe in hell, except the one they are creating.
But–and I choke on the words I am writing–like mikee says, if it’s between neutral and satanic, s*&!, s*&!, s*&!, I guess I will vote neutral. Damn!