“….crimes that do not involve victims are not in the Legal Sense….”
Really? So under the Feds Rules, in this ‘Hypothetical Scenario,” the Driver of the Getaway Car in a Bank Robbery can’t be charged with Murder even though the Bank Guard was killed in the Hold Up?
And they used TWO Different DA’s Offices for the Same Event?
Maybe I’m missing something, but why would the Zapatas have been contacted in the first place regarding someone they didn’t know doing something after (or was it before?) the fact that their son was murdered? What possible difference to them would it make, legally, sentimentally, practically, officially?
February 23rd, 2012 at 11:31 am
“….crimes that do not involve victims are not in the Legal Sense….”
Really? So under the Feds Rules, in this ‘Hypothetical Scenario,” the Driver of the Getaway Car in a Bank Robbery can’t be charged with Murder even though the Bank Guard was killed in the Hold Up?
And they used TWO Different DA’s Offices for the Same Event?
Even Sgt. Schultz would cry ‘BULLSHIT!”
February 23rd, 2012 at 7:20 pm
Maybe I’m missing something, but why would the Zapatas have been contacted in the first place regarding someone they didn’t know doing something after (or was it before?) the fact that their son was murdered? What possible difference to them would it make, legally, sentimentally, practically, officially?
February 23rd, 2012 at 10:09 pm
Watergate didn’t have a body count.