But NRA doesn’t care about NFA!
I read that on the internet a lot. But here they are discussing suppressors.
8 Responses to “But NRA doesn’t care about NFA!”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
April 24th, 2012 at 11:34 am
Discussing it is not the same as actively trying to sue the gov to get a horribly unconstitutional law overturned. For t hat you need an actual gun rights organization who you know, does something like the last two supreme court wins. . . the SAF
April 24th, 2012 at 11:43 am
Them thinking of changing their mind does not make the previous statements incorrect now dude.
April 24th, 2012 at 3:07 pm
Removing suppressors from the NFA will not effect the value of NRA leader’s machingun collections.
April 24th, 2012 at 4:34 pm
Depending on what their collectable machine guns are, they may not be affected by lifting the entire NFA.
Yeah, the M-16s will take a big hit, but I suspect the Vickers will be just fine! =P
April 24th, 2012 at 7:47 pm
If the people will lead, the NRA will follow. Maybe 5 or 10 years late, but they will follow.
April 24th, 2012 at 7:58 pm
Its like trying to force a donkey that is dying of thirst to drink water.. No matter how much you force it it will not drink… Not until it sees the other donkeys tanking up does it decide it is okay… Of course by then most of the water is gone….
April 24th, 2012 at 10:05 pm
Marshall, except SAF didn’t bring the Heller case and their Privileges and Immunities argument was ridiculed by the court in McDonald. It was Due Process which NRA argued which actually prevailed.
April 25th, 2012 at 11:06 am
Mike wrong.